9 August 2026
Every league has its share of dynasties, and every era has its defining faces. We have watched LeBron James redefine longevity, Patrick Mahomes bend the laws of quarterbacking, and Shohei Ohtani make the impossible look routine. But the clock never stops. The next wave is already knocking, and the transition from star to MVP is never as simple as raw talent. It takes opportunity, health, team context, and a certain mental shift that separates the great from the all-time greats.
Predicting future MVPs is not about picking the most gifted athlete. It is about reading the intersection of skill, situation, and timing. Some players are obvious. Others will surprise you. And a few will fail not because they lack ability, but because the circumstances around them never align. Let's break down who is actually poised to take over, why they fit the profile, and what could derail them.

In the NFL, the MVP is essentially a quarterback award. Since 2013, the only non-quarterback to win it was Cooper Kupp in 2021, and even that felt like a tribute to a historic triple-crown season rather than a true shift in voter philosophy. Running backs and defensive players rarely get serious consideration unless they do something unprecedented.
In baseball, the MVP is more balanced between position players and pitchers, but voters still favor everyday players who contribute in multiple facets. A starting pitcher has to put up a season like Ohtani's 2023 or a sub-2.00 ERA with 300 strikeouts to even enter the conversation.
So when we project future MVPs, we are not asking who is the best player. We are asking who can build a season that fits the voting criteria. That changes everything.
But the catch is his conditioning and defensive effort. Voters are not supposed to punish players for defense if they are transcendent on offense, but they do. Jokic gets a pass because his defense is underrated and his efficiency is elite. Doncic does not have that luxury. He takes a lot of difficult shots, he hunts fouls, and his off-ball movement can be static.
The good news is that he is only 25. He has time to refine his body and his approach. If the Mavericks continue to improve and he posts a 34-9-9 season on better efficiency, the narrative will be impossible to ignore. The risk is that he becomes the next James Harden: a statistical monster who never wins the big one and eventually loses voter sympathy.
The issue with Edwards is consistency. He can go cold for stretches, and his playmaking is still a work in progress. MVPs in the modern NBA need to be more than scorers. They need to make their teammates better. Edwards averaged around five assists per game in 2024-25, which is fine, but not elite for a perimeter star.
If he takes a leap as a passer and improves his three-point consistency, he has a real shot. He also has the advantage of playing in a smaller market, which sometimes helps because the narrative becomes "one-man show" rather than "superteam member." The Timberwolves are not a superteam. They are a good team built around him. That narrative fits the MVP mold.
The problem is that the Spurs are not ready to compete. MVP voters rarely reward players on lottery teams. The last player to win MVP on a team outside the top four in its conference was Russell Westbrook in 2017, and that was a historic triple-double season. Wembanyama could put up absurd numbers, but if the Spurs win 35 games, he will not get serious consideration.
That said, the Spurs are building smartly. They have cap space, draft picks, and a coach in Gregg Popovich who knows how to develop talent. If they add a legitimate point guard and a couple of shooters, Wembanyama could be a top-three MVP candidate by 2027. The real question is whether he can stay healthy. His frame is unprecedented, and the NBA season is a grind. If he avoids major injuries, he might win multiple MVPs in his prime.
The knock on Haliburton is that he is not an elite scorer. He averages around 20-21 points per game, which is great, but not MVP-level. He would need to push that to 26-27 while maintaining his assist numbers. That is possible, but it requires a shift in his mentality. He is too unselfish sometimes.
If the Pacers become a top-three seed in the East and Haliburton posts a 25-12 season, he could be a dark horse. The league loves a good story, and Haliburton is well-liked by media and players. That matters more than people think.

The current king is Patrick Mahomes, but he is not the future. He is the present. The question is who comes after him, and more importantly, who can dethrone him before he retires.
Allen is also in a tough spot. The Bills have a good roster, but they are not the Chiefs. They do not have the same offensive weapons or the same coaching stability. Allen has to do too much, which leads to mistakes.
If he cuts down on turnovers and the Bills win 13 games, he is the favorite. He has the narrative, the highlight reel, and the respect of his peers. The clock is ticking though. He is 28, and quarterbacks in their prime usually win MVPs between 25 and 30. He has maybe three or four realistic windows left.
Burrow's issue is the offensive line. He gets sacked too often, and he has already dealt with significant injuries. If the Bengals fix their protection, Burrow could put up 40 touchdowns and win the award easily. He has the mental makeup and the clutch factor that voters love.
The risk is that he becomes a "what if" player. If injuries pile up, he might never have a fully healthy MVP-caliber season. That would be a shame, because his ceiling is as high as anyone's.
But Stroud is not there yet. The Texans need to build a more consistent running game and improve their defense. Stroud also needs to show he can handle a full season of defensive adjustments. The second-year slump is real for many quarterbacks.
If he avoids that slump and the Texans win 11 or 12 games, he will be in the MVP conversation. He has the personality and the media appeal. He is the kind of player the league wants to market.
Hurts came in second in MVP voting in 2022, losing to Mahomes in a close race. He has been in the conversation since. The problem is that his passing efficiency can dip, and he has fumble issues. If he cleans those up and the Eagles are the top seed, he could win it.
The counterargument is that his style is unsustainable. Quarterbacks who run as much as he does tend to decline faster. But Hurts is smart about contact. He slides, he runs out of bounds, and he protects himself. He might have a longer prime than people expect.
Acuna is still young and in his prime. If he stays healthy, he could win multiple MVPs. The concern is his knee. He tore his ACL in 2021 and has had other lower-body issues. Speed is his weapon, and if he loses that, his value drops.
The Braves are a strong team, which helps. Voters love players on contenders. If Acuna puts up another 30-50 season and the Braves win the division, he will be the front-runner again.
The issue with Soto is that he does not contribute on defense or basepaths. He is a below-average outfielder and a slow runner. That hurts his overall value, even if his bat is elite. He would need a season like 2024, where he hit 41 homers and drove in 109 runs, to overcome those deficits.
Soto is also in a contract year in 2025, which could motivate him. Players often have career seasons when they are playing for a new deal. If he does, he could easily win the NL MVP.
Witt finished second in AL MVP voting in 2024, losing to Aaron Judge. The Royals made the playoffs, which helped his case. He is only 24, and he is getting better every year.
The only question is whether he can maintain his production. Shortstops often decline defensively as they age, but Witt's athleticism is elite. If he stays healthy, he is a lock for multiple MVP-caliber seasons. The Royals are not a powerhouse, but they are competitive, which is enough.
But that is a big if. Pitchers only pitch every five days, and their value is inherently limited. Voters have shown they will only give the MVP to a pitcher in truly historic seasons, like Ohtani or Justin Verlander in 2011. Skenes would need to be perfect, and even then, he might lose to a position player with big numbers.
The more realistic path for Skenes is a Cy Young Award, which is the pitcher's equivalent of the MVP. That is not a knock. It is just the reality of the award structure.
The common mistake fans make is assuming that the most talented player will automatically win. That is not how it works. The MVP is a narrative award as much as a statistical one. The player who wins has a story that resonates with voters. They are either carrying a team, breaking a record, or doing something we have never seen before.
The misconception is that "team success" is the main factor. It is not. The MVP is an individual award, but it is heavily influenced by team wins. A player on a 45-win team almost never wins. A player on a 60-win team with slightly worse stats often does. That is why context matters so much.
Another mistake is overvaluing playoff performance. The MVP is a regular season award. Playoff success helps the narrative, but it does not directly factor into the vote. A player who dominates in the playoffs but has a mediocre regular season will not win.
Also, watch for narrative shifts. If a player joins a new team and immediately turns them into a contender, that is a huge boost. If a player breaks a longstanding record, that is almost automatic. If a player carries a team through injuries to key teammates, that is the kind of story that wins votes.
What matters is timing. The MVP is about being the best at the right moment, in the right situation, with the right story. The players who understand that, who adapt their game to the award's criteria, and who stay healthy will take over. The ones who do not will remain great but never reach the top.
The future is bright, and the competition is fierce. That is what makes sports so compelling. We are not just watching games. We are watching history in progress, and the next MVPs are already writing their chapters.
all images in this post were generated using AI tools
Category:
Next Generation AthletesAuthor:
Nelson Bryant